Despite the wealth of information within the results of our national accounting indicators, they do not constitute the full picture of national progress. Two other crucial aspects that governments should equally measure to ensure that they are doing the best for their citizens are:
The Canadian statistician Robert Prescott-Allen has specifically addressed the issue of how national indicator sets should best be designed to include measures of subjective well-being alongside measures of welfare from other spheres. The diagram below, taken from the National Accounts of Well-being report, shows an adapted version of one possible structure for national well-being indicators which he has devised. Core measures of human well-being, such as the national well-being accounts presented in this report, are surrounded by measures at society level, such as the economy and governance system through which human well-being is enabled. This human layer of activity exerts pressure on the overall eco-system well-being which is described via measures such as resource use and biodiversity.
This type of multilayered structure of national indicators provides an explicit mechanism for exploring the links between how lives are subjectively experienced and:
nefs Happy Planet Index is an example of an indicator which takes these different aspects and summarises them into an easily communicable indicator of the ecological efficiency with which nations deliver human well-being. However a multilayered national accounting structure of the kind we are proposing would allow the relationships between these elements to be unpacked, so that we better understand how actions within one sphere impact on the others.